For Schools & Principals
Not another dashboard. A quiet system that reads the papers your teachers already mark, spots the topics your school is losing marks on, and gives you numbers you can trust in front of a governing council.

Built around what actually helps — no fluff, no jargon.
Which topics is Grade 8 struggling with in Science? Which class is ahead of the rest in Math? Patterns that only emerge when every classroom's papers are looked at together — visible before term-end, not after.
Within one mark of the teacher on 95–97% of questions in our pilot cohort — measured on 900+ handwritten answers. Three AI models cross-check every paper. If they disagree, a teacher decides.
Same papers, same marking scheme, same workflow. They upload, we read alongside, and they sign off. Most teachers save around 3 hours per class per test. This is not a replacement — it's a second pair of eyes your teacher controls.
Every parent gets a plain-English weekly or termly note about their child. Fewer 'how is he doing?' calls. Better PTMs. Easier admissions conversations.
Your teachers, students and parents each log in to the view that matters to them. But the whole system runs on one thing: the papers your teachers already mark. Nothing on the student side happens without a teacher-signed-off evaluation upstream.
This started as an IIM Calcutta capstone on how to grade fairly with AI. We publish our accuracy numbers. When the models don't agree, we tell you instead of guessing. And your teachers stay in charge — nothing gets marked without a human sign-off.

We're piloting with a handful of schools this term. A 20-minute call is enough to figure out if it makes sense — no pitch deck, just a real conversation.